Some of the answers I received about a XmHTML survey I made in April 1997,
during full alpha development.

The question I asked was: What do you like about XmHTML?

LOVE that parser :-)
	shl@cc.gatech.edu (Susan Liebeskind)

It is rapidly developing by a high skilled professional. It's alive, unlike
many commercial software! And there are some utilites and approaches inside
it that are interesting for me as a programmer. I like GPL licensing also.
	Valery Kravchuk <valera@itech.kiev.ua>

Being written by someone else :-) (seriously, I wouldnt be nearly so far
advanced in such a short time if I was writing this)
	Dick Porter <dick@cymru.net>

Its license. Like LessTif, it can be used by most anybody.
Also it is the basis for lots of interesting stuff.
	Danny Backx <u27113@kb.be>

It's license.  Also like the fact that it is being updated frequently.
	Eric Marttila <eam@thermoanalytics.com>

Rather simple to build in 
	eedroh@eed.ericsson.se (Roland Heinen)

It's flexability, and price. :)
	Ricky Ralston <rlr@atl.hp.com>

- License
- HTML 3.2 compliant
	Nourrit Jean Michel <jm.nourrit@univ-reims.fr>

License.  Our application is commercial and every other HTML widget or
hypertext help system either a) was free and prohibited use in a
commercial application or b) was not free and was not ported to our
operating system and source was not available.
	Milburn Taylor <mwt@starbase.neosoft.com>