Skip Headers
Oracle® Database Administrator's Guide
11g Release 1 (11.1)

Part Number B28310-01
Go to Documentation Home
Go to Book List
Book List
Go to Table of Contents
Go to Index
Go to Master Index
Master Index
Go to Feedback page
Contact Us

Go to previous page
Go to next page
View PDF

Guidelines for Managing Indexes

This section discusses guidelines for managing indexes and contains the following topics:

Create Indexes After Inserting Table Data

Data is often inserted or loaded into a table using either the SQL*Loader or an import utility. It is more efficient to create an index for a table after inserting or loading the data. If you create one or more indexes before loading data, the database then must update every index as each row is inserted.

Creating an index on a table that already has data requires sort space. Some sort space comes from memory allocated for the index creator. The amount for each user is determined by the initialization parameter SORT_AREA_SIZE. The database also swaps sort information to and from temporary segments that are only allocated during the index creation in the users temporary tablespace.

Under certain conditions, data can be loaded into a table with SQL*Loader direct-path load and an index can be created as data is loaded.

See Also:

Oracle Database Utilities for information about using SQL*Loader for direct-path load

Index the Correct Tables and Columns

Use the following guidelines for determining when to create an index:

  • Create an index if you frequently want to retrieve less than 15% of the rows in a large table. The percentage varies greatly according to the relative speed of a table scan and how the distribution of the row data in relation to the index key. The faster the table scan, the lower the percentage; the more clustered the row data, the higher the percentage.

  • To improve performance on joins of multiple tables, index columns used for joins.


    Primary and unique keys automatically have indexes, but you might want to create an index on a foreign key.
  • Small tables do not require indexes. If a query is taking too long, then the table might have grown from small to large.

Columns That Are Suitable for Indexing

Some columns are strong candidates for indexing. Columns with one or more of the following characteristics are candidates for indexing:

  • Values are relatively unique in the column.

  • There is a wide range of values (good for regular indexes).

  • There is a small range of values (good for bitmap indexes).

  • The column contains many nulls, but queries often select all rows having a value. In this case, use the following phrase:

    WHERE COL_X > -9.99 * power(10,125)

    Using the preceding phrase is preferable to:


    This is because the first uses an index on COL_X (assuming that COL_X is a numeric column).

Columns That Are Not Suitable for Indexing

Columns with the following characteristics are less suitable for indexing:

  • There are many nulls in the column and you do not search on the not null values.

LONG and LONG RAW columns cannot be indexed.

Virtual Columns

You can create unique or non-unique indexes on virtual columns.

Order Index Columns for Performance

The order of columns in the CREATE INDEX statement can affect query performance. In general, specify the most frequently used columns first.

If you create a single index across columns to speed up queries that access, for example, col1, col2, and col3; then queries that access just col1, or that access just col1 and col2, are also speeded up. But a query that accessed just col2, just col3, or just col2 and col3 does not use the index.

Limit the Number of Indexes for Each Table

A table can have any number of indexes. However, the more indexes there are, the more overhead is incurred as the table is modified. Specifically, when rows are inserted or deleted, all indexes on the table must be updated as well. Also, when a column is updated, all indexes that contain the column must be updated.

Thus, there is a trade-off between the speed of retrieving data from a table and the speed of updating the table. For example, if a table is primarily read-only, having more indexes can be useful; but if a table is heavily updated, having fewer indexes could be preferable.

Drop Indexes That Are No Longer Required

Consider dropping an index if:

  • It does not speed up queries. The table could be very small, or there could be many rows in the table but very few index entries.

  • The queries in your applications do not use the index.

  • The index must be dropped before being rebuilt.

Estimate Index Size and Set Storage Parameters

Estimating the size of an index before creating one can facilitate better disk space planning and management. You can use the combined estimated size of indexes, along with estimates for tables, the undo tablespace, and redo log files, to determine the amount of disk space that is required to hold an intended database. From these estimates, you can make correct hardware purchases and other decisions.

Use the estimated size of an individual index to better manage the disk space that the index uses. When an index is created, you can set appropriate storage parameters and improve I/O performance of applications that use the index. For example, assume that you estimate the maximum size of an index before creating it. If you then set the storage parameters when you create the index, fewer extents are allocated for the table data segment, and all of the index data is stored in a relatively contiguous section of disk space. This decreases the time necessary for disk I/O operations involving this index.

The maximum size of a single index entry is approximately one-half the data block size.

See Also:

"Managing Storage Parameters" for specific information about storage parameters

Specify the Tablespace for Each Index

Indexes can be created in any tablespace. An index can be created in the same or different tablespace as the table it indexes. If you use the same tablespace for a table and its index, it can be more convenient to perform database maintenance (such as tablespace or file backup) or to ensure application availability. All the related data is always online together.

Using different tablespaces (on different disks) for a table and its index produces better performance than storing the table and index in the same tablespace. Disk contention is reduced. But, if you use different tablespaces for a table and its index and one tablespace is offline (containing either data or index), then the statements referencing that table are not guaranteed to work.

Consider Parallelizing Index Creation

You can parallelize index creation, much the same as you can parallelize table creation. Because multiple processes work together to create the index, the database can create the index more quickly than if a single server process created the index sequentially.

When creating an index in parallel, storage parameters are used separately by each query server process. Therefore, an index created with an INITIAL value of 5M and a parallel degree of 12 consumes at least 60M of storage during index creation.

See Also:

Consider Creating Indexes with NOLOGGING

You can create an index and generate minimal redo log records by specifying NOLOGGING in the CREATE INDEX statement.


Because indexes created using NOLOGGING are not archived, perform a backup after you create the index.

Creating an index with NOLOGGING has the following benefits:

  • Space is saved in the redo log files.

  • The time it takes to create the index is decreased.

  • Performance improves for parallel creation of large indexes.

In general, the relative performance improvement is greater for larger indexes created without LOGGING than for smaller ones. Creating small indexes without LOGGING has little effect on the time it takes to create an index. However, for larger indexes the performance improvement can be significant, especially when you are also parallelizing the index creation.

Consider Costs and Benefits of Coalescing or Rebuilding Indexes

Improper sizing or increased growth can produce index fragmentation. To eliminate or reduce fragmentation, you can rebuild or coalesce the index. But before you perform either task weigh the costs and benefits of each option and choose the one that works best for your situation. Table 19-1 is a comparison of the costs and benefits associated with rebuilding and coalescing indexes.

Table 19-1 To Rebuild or Coalesce ... That Is the Question

Rebuild Index Coalesce Index

Quickly moves index to another tablespace

Cannot move index to another tablespace

Higher costs: requires more disk space

Lower costs: does not require more disk space

Creates new tree, shrinks height if applicable

Coalesces leaf blocks within same branch of tree

Enables you to quickly change storage and tablespace parameters without having to drop the original index.

Quickly frees up index leaf blocks for use.

In situations where you have B-tree index leaf blocks that can be freed up for reuse, you can merge those leaf blocks using the following statement:


Figure 19-1 illustrates the effect of an ALTER INDEX COALESCE on the index vmoore. Before performing the operation, the first two leaf blocks are 50% full. This means you have an opportunity to reduce fragmentation and completely fill the first block, while freeing up the second.

Figure 19-1 Coalescing Indexes

Description of Figure 19-1 follows
Description of "Figure 19-1 Coalescing Indexes"

Consider Cost Before Disabling or Dropping Constraints

Because unique and primary keys have associated indexes, you should factor in the cost of dropping and creating indexes when considering whether to disable or drop a UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY constraint. If the associated index for a UNIQUE key or PRIMARY KEY constraint is extremely large, you can save time by leaving the constraint enabled rather than dropping and re-creating the large index. You also have the option of explicitly specifying that you want to keep or drop the index when dropping or disabling a UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY constraint.